Epic Shifts to AI-Centered Game Development | Staff Told "No More Hand-Written Code"
機械翻訳 / Machine-translated
A
AI Friends
2日前・17分で読める
機械翻訳 / Machine-translated
@aifriends
AI Friends（https://aifriends.jp）のクロスポスト公式アカウント。AIツールの紹介・使い方・できることを、中学生でもわかるやさしい日本語で届けます。
Would you believe it if someone told you that humans no longer need to write game code? Epic Games — the company behind Fortnite — has reportedly told its new game's development team exactly that. This article explains what happened and why it matters.
On October 12, 2026, Bloomberg reported that Epic Games is transitioning to an AI-centered development structure. The story was also covered in Japan by GIGAZINE.
The game in question is a new title being co-developed with Disney — reportedly a shooter featuring Marvel and Star Wars characters.
An internal message obtained by Bloomberg contained instructions to the effect that "hand-written code is no longer necessary." Art assets are also to be produced entirely through AI-driven workflows.
The role of humans is to delegate work to AI, review the output, and adjust the direction. Developers effectively become supervisors overseeing AI.
Among the AI tools being used, Claude — made by Anthropic, a U.S. AI company — is said to have been mentioned by name.
The game had been targeting a March 2027 release. However, the development team has not been given a new launch date.
According to Bloomberg's sources, development was already running behind schedule, with Epic having underestimated the number of people and amount of time required.
It's important to note that the cause has not been definitively established. Reports cite both "the shift to AI" and "staffing shortages and development delays" as potential reasons for the delay.
Epic itself has not explained the reason for the delay. Disney has also reportedly not issued any official comment on the reporting.
In other words, it's impossible at this point to say definitively whether "the switch to AI caused the delay" or "the delay led them to rely on AI."
Epic's head of communications, Jake Jones, commented that Epic is "embracing AI-accelerated development," while also stating that developers remain at the creative center.
CEO Tim Sweeney explained on X (formerly Twitter) that this is a major shift — repositioning developers to prepare for "maximum AI acceleration."
The goal, he said, is not to accomplish the same things with fewer people, but to enable everyone to create more and better work. He also expressed a desire to bring those benefits to teams using Unreal Engine — the software used to build games.
Sweeney further noted that the biggest change will be a dramatic reduction in the time from concept to playable build. He also suggested that many recent AAA game failures stem from a lack of playtesting during development.
The policy was reportedly communicated in a video call in early October. Some developers were described as stunned and confused.
Questions arose such as "who fixes AI-generated mistakes, and how?" Jokes reportedly circulated like "Does Claude fix Claude's bugs?"
Some reportedly hoped the policy would be reversed, while others were skeptical about whether it would work as intended.
Imagine being told that work you've always done by hand should, starting tomorrow, be replaced with simply "giving instructions to AI." It's natural to feel anxiety before excitement.
The backdrop is Epic's financial situation. On March 24, 2026, Epic announced layoffs of more than 1,000 employees.
Sweeney explained that Fortnite engagement had been declining since 2025, and the company had been spending more than it earned. Epic reportedly cut over $500 million in costs, including reductions in outsourcing and advertising.
At that time, he explicitly stated that "the layoffs have nothing to do with AI."
His enthusiasm for AI is not new. In an IGN interview in June 2025, he said the day was near when a small team of around ten people could create a game on the scale of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild.
The current news is seen as an attempt to test that vision on a major real-world project. Bloomberg reportedly characterized it as the first attempt by a major game company to place AI at the center of the production process.
Epic is not the only game company investing heavily in AI — but the approaches differ.
The moves by Krafton and Square Enix were mentioned in an Inven Global article.
While many companies are incorporating AI into specific parts of their pipelines, Epic is attempting to overhaul its entire development approach. That distinction is what makes this case significant.
Many Japanese game studios use Unreal Engine. If Epic refines its AI development methods internally, the results could be delivered as new engine features. Sweeney has said he wants to share those benefits with Unreal Engine teams.
Consider, for example, a small indie game team of around five people. If a prototype that used to take six months could be completed in a few weeks, the number of ideas they could test would increase dramatically.
On the other hand, some players want to know when AI is involved in a game's creation. Sweeney has suggested that AI-use tags on game storefronts will become meaningless, since virtually all future games will involve AI in some capacity.
This view is likely to be met with mixed reactions. In Japan too, discussions about how to label AI-made games will probably grow in the coming years.
This report concerns the team working on the new game co-developed with Disney. There are no reports that Fortnite as a whole is shifting to an AI-centered model.
No. The details about the delay and internal instructions are based on accounts from sources and internal messages obtained by Bloomberg. What Epic has confirmed is the broader direction of pursuing AI-accelerated development.
The March 2027 target has been dropped, and no new date has been given to the development team.
Regarding the layoffs of more than 1,000 employees in March 2026, Sweeney stated they "have nothing to do with AI." No official connection between those layoffs and the current AI transition has been established.
The answer isn't in yet. Concerns have been raised on the ground about how to handle AI-generated mistakes. Results won't be visible until development on this game progresses further.
For now, keep an eye on further updates — and watch for what AI features are making their way into the game engines and tools you use.
This article is a cross-post from AI Friends.
